Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:32:47 +0900
Dear D.B. Cc xxxx
Thank you for email from Greece.
As you wrote, I do not know well about the present condition of Kaisho Forest.NURAD Project at Kaisho was definitely cancelled in 2000. But I am unsure whether the post-EXPO project at Kaisho Forest is enough or not.I do not know any articles in English or the Post EXPO projects.I would like to introduce xxxx (former NGO stuff) and xxx.Best,
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:05:19 +0900
>I don't know what NURAD represent for, but urban development plan
>after the Aichi EXPO was terminated in 2000 as you mentioned.
I used NURAD as accronyum for the new urban development plan (新住宅).I wrote several English documents for Aichi EXPO:
[A54] Matsuda H, Serizawa S, Ueda K, Kato T, Yahara T (2003) Extinction Risk Assessment of Vascular Plants in the 2005 World Exposition, Japan. Chemosphere 53(4): 325-336.
[A41] Matsuda H, Hada Y, Moriyama A, Washitani I (2001)'SATOYAMA' and environmental impact assessment for the World Exposition 2005: A conservation ecological evaluation. Global Environment Research 5:183-192.
[B20x] Matsuda H () Positive and Negative Aspects of the Environmental Impact Assessment for Japan's World Exposition 2005 . in "Progress in Environmental Research" Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Hauppauge, NY, in press (I do not know whether this has been published or not)[B14] Matsuda H (2001) Application of the EIA law system to the 2005 World Exposition. Built Environment 27:51-56.
